Why is the domain-centric approach critical to test BFSI applications?
Digital technology has seen its footprint being
extended and firmly imprinted in the BFSI sector. It facilitates customers to
execute myriad transactions at the press of a button or screen swipe through
seamless banking applications. These applications have precluded the need for
customers to visit a bank or insurance branch for carrying out routine
activities like depositing, transferring, or withdrawing money. They have
become increasingly interconnected and complex and have to ensure the highest
levels of security to save confidential financial or/and personal information
from falling into wrong hands.
The banking applications enable banks and financial
institutions to offer a wide range of services driven by the latest
technologies. The services may include transactions per second, incident management,
auditing and reporting, data storage, and integrations. Besides, the various
functionalities offered by such applications may include diverse payment
gateways, cards, and account dashboards, among others.
Since these applications deal with the confidential
data of customers and businesses, they need to ensure protection against the
growing menace of cybercrime. Moreover, they need to deliver superior
performance, unmatched quality, ease-of-use, convenience, and excellent
customer experiences. To enable these and allow the banks or insurance
companies to maintain their competitive advantage, they should be subjected to
rigorous end-to-end BFSI testing.
One of the crucial outcomes of banking application testing is
enabling the application to comply with regulatory standards. All said and
done, testing of such applications can entail a few challenges.
Challenges in BFSI testing
While financial
services application testing is a critical requirement to ensure the smooth
functioning of such applications, it involves a few below-mentioned challenges
as well:
Data
security and regression testing: These exist as key
challenges given the cost imperatives and the need to comply with stringent
data confidentiality norms. So, to address these challenges effectively, the
team running QA for banks ought
to build a comprehensive test environment, a test suite, and implement test
data management. The testers can use sophisticated data management tools to
ensure data integrity through information masking. The best way to go about
conducting regression testing as part of BFSI testing is to implement test automation. This will help to
ensure greater speed, accuracy, and early identification of glitches.
Complexity:
The BFSI landscape is very complex with the
presence of legacy systems and calls for security and version updates to keep
up with the changing regulatory and market requirements. For example, a typical
web or mobile
application release may involve the running of around 200 test scripts
thereby making it a complex exercise.
Diverse
testing environments: The applications need to be
tested on a diverse range of devices, browsers, operating systems, and
networks. Besides, with the advent of advanced wearable devices, the banking
apps need to be tested on Apple Watch or Google Glass to validate their
functioning for the digitally-savvy customers.
Why implement a domain-centric approach in banking domain testing?
Banking domain testing
entails the assessment of different facets of banking software to ensure secure
transactions, stable performance, and superior user experiences. The other
benefits of taking a domain-centric approach are as follows:
Identifying
and fixing performance issues: Testing
banking domain apps helps the BFSI entity to
understand user behavior and identify issues that app users are likely to face.
This helps the business to be confident about the product/application once it
is released into the market.
A
better understanding of workflows: Testing allows the
validation of banking modules and their seamless functioning. It shows whether
the workflows are secured and transparent, and can work independently.
Technical
debt during maintenance: Part of the legacy code,
technical debt can be understood better by the programmer by analyzing the old
logs. The use of unit tests and related documentation can help to deal with the
complexities of a banking application.
Manage
workflows and dependencies: The complex banking or
insurance applications come with layered workflows and a huge number of
dependencies. These can be better monitored and assessed through digital banking testing.
Retaining
users: Testing banking applications can
let a developer understand the threshold of the number of users the application
can serve without facing latency, errors, or downtime. It allows developers to
optimize the application’s performance and deliver high-quality services to the
users thereby increasing the retention rates.
Conclusion
BFSI applications are vulnerable to security and performance issues, which is why the testing team should implement a detailed testing framework, especially domain-centric, to comply with regulatory standards, enable quick bug fixing, improve efficiency, enhance security, and allow future maintenance. BFSI testing will help such applications in driving conversions and upholding security.
Resource
James Daniel is a software Tech enthusiastic & works
at Cigniti Technologies. I'm having a great understanding of today's
software testing quality that yields strong results and always happy to create
valuable content & share thoughts.
Article Source: medium.com

Comments
Post a Comment