How Does Testing-as-a-Service Fit into Testing the Internet of Things

 

internet-of-things

The Internet of Things (IoT) market is expanding rapidly with new devices being installed to automate devices, systems, and networks. According to Statista, the total installed base of IoT devices is projected to touch 13.8 billion units by the end of 2021, and leapfrog to 30.9 billion units by 2025. The IoT ecosystem is likely to change the way people lead their lives by taking smart computing to the physical world. This will make the scope of computing even more decentralized and distributed. The profusion of so many devices connected to the internet generating, processing, and transmitting data streams needs to be stringently tested for quality. This is to ensure the data streams lead to correct decision-making in a real-time environment. Given that distributed and remotely located IoT systems have to process humongous volumes of data, they are open to being exploited by threat actors. The multifarious challenges related to the security and scalability of IoT systems call for implementing an IoT testing framework.

The need for automation in IoT testing

With the increased scale of IoT implementation, aspects such as non-functional requirements and security have become critical. The internet of things usually comprises a blend of components, namely, gateways, sensors, applications, data centers, and networks. This entails the use of automation in the IoT testing approach to manage various types of testing for these components. Needless to say, the traditional software testing methodology cannot suffice to handle a multitude of tests in a distributed environment. These include testing for security, performance, stability, conformance, and integration, among others. To cater to the complexity of internet of things QA testing, service-based testing has become important.

Why opt for service-based testing in IoT?

When the embedded software within the IoT systems goes through various development phases, namely, integration, testing becomes challenging. During such phases, several bugs or vulnerabilities are detected, unlike during testing at the unit level. Moreover, the risks of bugs can emanate from the unsecured hardware resources being used within an in-house test lab. Service-based testing or TaaS, can fit into the requirement for specialized testing vis-à-vis IoT devices. TaaS for the IoT may involve a test platform, a combination of infrastructure and software, or virtualization of the entire test department. The TaaS model for IoT testing may operate in the following way:

·         A user scenario and environment are developed for testing

·         A SaaS portal is provided to run tests and retrieve test data

·         Leverage an on-demand automated test lab

·         A test library is created with configurable parameters and user scenario descriptions

·         A metering function is enabled to track used resources and their costs

·         A test is designed and run in the test environment offered by the cloud vendor

·         The test performance is monitored and the company’s capability to meet the goals mentioned in the test design is evaluated

Benefits of using Testing-as-a-Service for IoT

The complexity of testing IoT devices due to the multiplicity of components in such devices requires the use of Testing-as-a-Service. The benefits are as follows:

Increased productivity: Automation in testing for IoT devices can create testing loads and service-based tests that are scalable and repeatable. Runtime analysis tools are able to detect bugs, quickly and easily. After fixing the bugs, regression testing can be performed in alignment with the objectives of agile, continuous testing, and iterative development.

Removal of hardware bottlenecks: During test scheduling, the presence of dependent components in the form of higher-level functions or other devices can be a challenge. However, using Testing-as-a-Service, such bottlenecks can be removed through simulation, wherein individual testers can make use of virtual labs.

Robust security testing: A service-based approach to IoT security testing using automation can test every parameter related to security using realistic scenarios. This can ensure the identification and fixing of bugs or vulnerabilities easily. For example, a denial-of-service attack can flood an IoT device,such as a thermostat in an HVAC system. It is only through robust IoT security testing, comprising penetration testing, that the device can be made to withstand such an attack. Moreover, the scalability of a virtual TaaS environment can exceed an in-house test lab comprising real hardware.

Service virtualization: Since any IoT device testing solutions needs to address the testing requirements of a multiplicity of components present in an IoT system, service virtualization can be of help. It can create a virtual lab with repeatable test environments, which would be as effective as the real thing but cost a fraction of the price.

Conclusion

The accuracy and integrity of data streams generated by IoT devices are critical to their functioning and performance. It is only by leveraging Testing-as-a-Service that challenges related to productivity, scalability, and security in testing IoT applications can be addressed.

Resource

James Daniel is a software Tech enthusiastic & works at Cigniti Technologies. I'm having a great understanding of today's software testing quality that yields strong results and always happy to create valuable content & share thoughts.

Article Source: iotcentral.io

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Discuss Test Orchestration and its Role in Achieving Optimal Quality of Software

Image
  In the DevOps approach of developing, testing, and delivering software applications, there is a need to accelerate testing within the constraints of budget and time. This entails automating the testing process as part of the testing strategy. In many cases, continuous test automation is often considered as a discrete step in the build pipeline rather than a sequence of steps. For any continuous testing strategy, all software applications need to pass through a series of tests before they pass muster in the crucible of quality. These may include unit testing, integration testing, functional testing, smoke testing, performance testing, security testing, and others. For DevOps QA testing, each of these tests should be subjected to automation to enhance quality, reduce test time, and improve the certainty of software behavior. However, merely automating the tests left, right, and center does not augur well when it comes to achieving an optimal quality level as well as minimizing the ...
Read more

What is the Importance of Compatibility Testing for a Software Application?

Image
  Customers are wont to use software applications for various purposes across device platforms, networks, operating systems, and browsers. They expect the software applications to perform seamlessly irrespective of the digital environments. However, customer experience in real-time does not always achieve such performance causing disgruntlement. In an industry where new devices are launched with different configurations, and new versions of operating systems, frameworks, and browsers are released in a few weeks or months, ensuring the software application perform seamlessly across platforms can be a herculean task. Moreover, since it is practically impossible to evaluate each customer’s usage of a device, browser, operating system, or network, it is imperative to ensure the software application functions properly across digital environments. This calls for integrating compatibility testing in the SDLC. What is compatibility testing and why is it important? Compatibility testing...
Read more

How many Types of Mobile App Testing Services are there?

Image
  The utilitarian value of mobile phones has been mainly due to the plethora of applications that are accessed by users to perform a raft of activities. These may include watching movies, paying utility bills, booking tickets, playing games, reading informative content, and buying merchandise, among others. Does this mean users lap up every application on offer? The answer is an emphatic NO as users look for attributes such as fast loading time, enhanced security, seamless navigability, and many others. Even as businesses are aware of the need to employ mobile testing services and ensure the release of quality applications, the pressure to remain competitive often overrides such considerations. Statistics show that approximately 68.07 percent of mobile applications never reach 1,000 downloads (Statista). In other words, approximately 67 percent of mobile app developers do not make a profit. So, what is the way out and ensure the apps hit the bull’s eye of customers’ approval? It’s ...
Read more